Suffrage as an Eclipse of Black Female Humanity
In 1963, a pivotal year in American history, President John F. Kennedy entered his second term, global tensions were high with the Vietnam and Cold Wars, and the nation grappled with the pervasive impact of segregation. Amidst these challenges, the Equal Pay Act marked a significant step forward, celebrating its 60th anniversary this year. This legislation amended the Fair Labor Standards Act, requiring employers to rectify wage disparities between individuals of different sexes performing substantially equal jobs.
However, the historical context reveals a crucial oversight. Passed a year before the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which federally outlawed racial segregation, the Equal Pay Act primarily targeted gender discrimination but inadvertently excluded women of color. During this era, the term "women" in legislative discourse predominantly referred to white women. The Act failed to address the racial discrimination ingrained in the Jim Crow Era, leaving women of color without complete protection.
The struggle against inequity continued as President Lyndon B. Johnson's Executive Order 11246 in 1965 mandated federal agencies to implement the Civil Rights Act fully. This demonstrated the prolonged effort required to dismantle the discriminatory structures of the past. Yet, the Black Codes, emerging post-emancipation, compelled formerly enslaved individuals, particularly Black women, into exploitative labor contracts. This legacy persists, as Black women remain overrepresented in low-paid occupations, reflecting enduring disparities rooted in historical injustices.
The link between the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 highlights unintentional exclusions that plagued women with intersecting identities. Women's rights laws, while aiming to empower marginalized groups, inadvertently neglected those facing compounded effects of racial discrimination and misogyny. This oversight, treating race and gender as mutually exclusive, has perpetuated systemic disadvantages.
Reflecting on Audre Lorde's insight that struggles are not single-issue, this Women's History Month prompts a critical examination of progress and achievements. Presently, legal protections for women face limitations, with existing laws benefiting only those with U.S. citizenship and visa protection. Undocumented women, excluded from these safeguards, confront heightened vulnerability to exploitation and discrimination due to rigid immigration laws.
As we celebrate women's history, it becomes clear that a nuanced, intersectional approach is imperative. Legislation, such as the Equal Pay Act, must explicitly safeguard women of color, acknowledging and addressing the unique challenges faced by those with intersecting marginalized identities. In doing so, we pave the way for a more inclusive and equitable future for all women.
The Misogynoir to Mishpat (M2M) Research Network © 2024